Engineering assessments, reimagined

Software engineering assessments, built differently.

Candidates complete structured programming challenges in a real coding environment, and every submission is measured against clear, repeatable assessment results — correctness, performance, and code quality, all in one place.

See how the platform works

Switch between the core surfaces candidates and reviewers use every day.

assessment.workspace

Task Description

Merge Sorted Ranges

Given a list of numeric ranges, merge all overlapping ranges and return them sorted by start value.

32:14 remaining

Code Editor

function mergeRanges(ranges) {
  const sorted = [...ranges].sort(
    (a, b) => a[0] - b[0]
  );

  return sorted.reduce((merged, [s, e]) => {
    const last = merged[merged.length - 1];
    if (last && s <= last[1]) {
      last[1] = Math.max(last[1], e);
    } else {
      merged.push([s, e]);
    }
    return merged;
  }, []);
}

Test Results

  • handles no overlaps
  • merges adjacent ranges
  • merges nested ranges
  • handles empty input
Skills Intelligence

Know what your engineering team can actually do.

The same scoring we use to evaluate candidates can map your existing team. Where are the capability gaps? Who's ready for the next challenge? How is a skill profile changing as your stack evolves?

It's not a separate tool bolted on afterward — it's Screen and Interview's methodology, applied continuously, so capability stays visible even between hiring cycles.

JL

Jordan Lee

Backend Engineer II · Platform Team

Moderate fit · 74%

74%

Role fit

2

Skill gaps

3

Assessments

18d ago

Last assessed

Strengths

  • Data Structures+12 vs role
  • JavaScript+6 vs role

Gaps

  • System Design-17 vs role
  • API Design-11 vs role

Skills proficiency vs. role benchmark

CurrentRole benchmark
  • Data Structures92/ 80 required
  • System Design58/ 75 required
  • JavaScript86/ 80 required
  • API Design64/ 75 required
  • SQL78/ 70 required

Everything you need to run a fair, structured assessment

Real coding environment

Candidates write and run code in a familiar editor with live test execution, not a text box.

Automated CodeCheck

Every submission is scored on correctness, performance, and code quality the moment it's run.

Clear task results

A structured summary shows exactly which requirements passed, failed, or were partially met.

Consistent scoring

The same rubric is applied to every candidate, removing guesswork from technical screening.

Time-boxed sessions

Assessments run on a clear timer with autosave, so nothing is lost mid-challenge.

Task library

Pick from a growing library of language-agnostic challenges, or bring your own.

Verifiable certificates

Completed programmes issue a certificate with a public verification state.

Built for hiring & learning

Use the same platform for technical screening or structured skills development.

Ready to see it in action?

Start a structured coding assessment and get measurable results in minutes.

Start an assessment